: What liberties can I take with the monarchies in my own world? Could a writer make up his own rules, for a monarchy he created, in a world of his own making? My question is whether I
Could a writer make up his own rules, for a monarchy he created, in a world of his own making?
My question is whether I can completely disregard the rules and regulations of real-life monarchies, except for the very basest of them? This would extend to the royal family members, the king's harem, the deals with a neighboring kingdom, the politics, etc. Of course, I do plan on drawing influence from certain real-life events and such, but could I simply make up my own rules for how this monarchy operates?
More posts by @Gonzalez219
: This may depend on the writer and their style; what I think is a great opening line, and what you think is a great opening line, may be quite different things. Speaking for myself, I write
: What character names can I use for new heroes that are not copyrighted? I need to know if I can only use names that are not taken at all (very frustrating), or if there is a way to use
2 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
Of course, and it's arguably more interesting to do so. Obviously it will need to be logically coherent, and I'd suggest you write some history which uses or illustrates these differences. This has two purposes:
a) It will allow you to ensure your "rules" actually work (if the history is believable and logically consistent)
b) It will give you some points for characters to refer to, and generally give you more of a 'world'. You don't need to explain these references in the narrative, but you might want to have a glossary for the interested reader.
The (potentially) tricky bit will be explaining the important differences while walking a line between long, obvious exposition and small titbits of info which the reader fails to pick up. There are plenty of well-tried methods to do exposition without the reader noticing (too much).
Incluing is a word for scattering expository information seamlessly through a story, to avoid having to break the narrative for a chunk of exposition.
I don't see why not. Fiction does that all the time. The two most popular lies are "princesses rule in lieu of queens" and "it's routine for someone to come along and usurp the throne or otherwise make the right to rule ambiguous". Both of these may have sometimes happened historically, but in fantasy settings they're routine. A more realistic alternative might be boring, but an equally unrealistic alternative would be fresh.
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.