bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : Re: Is quality of writing subjective, or objective? When someone says that writing is good or bad, better or worse, is it merely a way to talk about whether something is popular, or interesting - selfpublishingguru.com

10% popularity

The question is invalidated by its wording. The 'quality' of any piece of communication can only be judged against the instigator's intent.

If bad grammar is used to provoke a calculated reaction from the recipient - then bad grammar is excellent.

But to judge the quality of a a piece of writing the reader would have to know the author's intent.

Take, for example: "Green Eggs and Ham". On one level it's total garbage - nonsensical even. However, it does have a catchy, repeitive quality that children may appreciate. So the story gets a pass.

Now consider the parameters under which the story was written: "Any idiot can write a kid's story. You only need to know fifty different words."

"Green Eggs & and Ham" contains exactly fifty different words, making it a high-quality, highly-skilled piece of work by a talented individual - I doubt I could do it.


Load Full (0)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Frith254

0 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

Back to top