: Do I include the method of my research in the title? For my Masters Thesis, I am trying to find an appropriate title. The field of the research is in Forestry and Geographic Information Science

Vote Up Vote Down

It sounds like the point of your paper isn't so much the costs themselves but the way you determined them. If you invented this model (or adapted it from an existing one with significant changes) and the point of the paper is to show how well it works, while also presenting your results, then the second title is better. On the other hand, if your paper is more about how you applied or adapted an existing model to the specific challenges in that region, your first title is better.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

A title tells the reader not only the general subject area, but also focus of your paper, the aspect of the subject that you will primarily emphasize.

Each of the following titles (your two plus one I added for contrast) suggests the same general subject area: Harvest costs for private forest landowners in the Pacific Northwest USA. But each suggests a different emphasis in your paper:

"Determining harvest costs for private forest landowners in the Pacific Northwest (USA)"
"A spatial model to determine harvest costs for private forest landowners in the Pacific Northwest (USA)"
"Harvest costs for private forest landowners in the Pacific Northwest (USA)"

The first title emphasizes the process of determining costs. The second emphasizes the model. The third emphasizes the costs themselves.

So... What aspect of your subject or method or conclusions do you wish to emphasize in your title?

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

The second title starting with 'spatial model' gives people an idea of what you've focussed on during the research.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

Usually you include what is important and innovative about your paper.

If there is a method more than half of your domain uses, and you use it too, there is no point writing about that in the title. If there are three competing methods, you may choose to include it in the title or not. If you use a method maybe 5% of your coleagues use, say, because it requires three times the effort for 20% accuracy gain, by all means, include it. If your research is testing a new method on known set of data, it's the method that is a must in the title, not what is being checked.

Essentially, the title says what's special about your research. If the method is, it belongs. If it's generic, it does not.

(0)