: What are the benefits of being a slush reader? I've heard a few people recommend doing time volunteering as a slush reader (for a small press magazine, say), as the experience can be helpful

Vote Up Vote Down

There are a lot of pros and cons to doing this

Pros:

You'll be exposed to a lot of bad writing and you'll know what not to do in your own work.
You'll be exposed to some good writing as well and know what you should do in your work.
You'll have a chance to learn insider tricks about what to do and what not to do during submission.
You have a chance to network in the publishing world and find connections that could help down the road.

Cons:

You'll most likely be working for free. Unless you've got experience in the publishing world, they're most likely not going to hire you to read through their slush pile.
You'll be reading a lot of bad writings. Too many writers don't put the necessary work into a manuscript before submitting it.
It's going to be long and tiring. You'll most likely have to meet a quota and it can be time consuming to read through manuscripts and queries.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

The pros-

You get a sense, really fast -- of what works and what doesn't
You see all the stupid mistakes writers make when they submit and get a pretty clear idea of what not to do
Reading a lot just makes you a better writer in the long run

The cons-

It can be laborious. It's fun to read a really great submission. It's hell to slog through a 50,000 word piece of trash.
You have to be careful about reading when you're also actively writing and developing. Any publisher that accepts on spec should make it clear that the submitter is waiving the right to sue over copyright, but you don't want to get slapped with a suit somewhere down the road because you wrote something similar to something someone once submitted and you read.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

I don't read slush for anyone, I read self-published stuff and other submissions to locations considered above and beyond the "writer's circle" for fun. What I get out of it is full perspective on the actually unspectacular nature of what someone might call "their killer idea".

I should point out I read a lot of SF/Fantasy/Horror and thrillers. In these books you want what Stewie from Family Guy once called a "compelling protagonist" and you also want some kind of hook idea which the protagonist encounters. A large number of authors have a serviceable hook idea but the wisdom and perception of the human condition one might expect from a breeze block. This has served to remind me since then that I'm not ready for even the small time until people like the people I write no matter how great my pontificating gets.

(0)