bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : Which one is the correct dialogue punctuation format? I am writing my first novel and this the very first confusion I would like to clarify. As I am not a native English speaker, I find it - selfpublishingguru.com

10.02% popularity

I am writing my first novel and this the very first confusion I would like to clarify. As I am not a native English speaker, I find it very hard to understand the punctuation scheme in direct speeches.
Which one of the following is correct? Please explain why the other one is wrong.

“I did what I needed to do.” He lowered his head to look at my face.
“You should've waited for me,” she replied.

or

“I did what I needed to do,” he lowered his head to look at my face.
“You should've waited for me,” she replied.

Also, how well does this punctuation rules apply for action tags like - he shrugged, he smile, he scoffed and similar tags.


Load Full (2)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Jessie137

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

10% popularity

Adding to @LaurenIpsum : Keep in mind that different countries punctuate differently. From this source:

American style uses double quotes (“) for initial quotations, then
single quotes (‘) for quotations within the initial quotation.

“Economic systems,” according to Professor White, “are an inevitable
byproduct of civilization, and are, as John Doe said, ‘with us whether
we want them or not.’”

British style uses single quotes (‘) for initial quotations, then
double quotes (“) for quotations within the initial quotation.

‘Economic systems’, according to Professor White, ‘are an inevitable
byproduct of civilization, and are, as John Doe said, “with us whether
we want them or not”’.

The above examples also show that the American style places commas and
periods inside the quotation marks, even if they are not in the
original material. British style (more sensibly) places unquoted
periods and commas outside the quotation marks. For all other
punctuation, the British and American styles are in agreement: unless
the punctuation is part of the quoted material, it goes outside the
quotation marks.

However, this site disagrees with the above site on some details. But, it agrees with me on the illogic of both systems.

The question of whether to place other punctuation marks inside or
outside quotation marks is a controversial one, [with] both the British and
American practices being to some extent at variance with logic. The
rule would seem obvious: other punctuation marks appear inside the
quotation marks when they are part of the quotation itself, and
outside when they are not. It is one of life’s enduring mysteries,
however, why neither British nor American conventions follows this
simple principle.

My advice is to be logical and consistent. If an editor insists on an illogical reformat ("because that's the rule"), then threaten to drop quote marks altogether, as some authors have done. :-)


Load Full (0)

10% popularity

The difference is that the first sentence doesn't have a tag. It's a line of dialogue followed by a complete sentence.

The second sentence is dialogue followed by a dialogue tag.

Your first set of examples is punctuated correctly — when you use a tag, the dialogue ends in a comma, and the tag starts with a lowercase letter. This also applies to action tags.


Load Full (0)

Back to top