: Is there a "standard" plot structure where the protagonist has a "bird in hand" at the end of Act II? In most plays I've studied, e.g. Erin Brockovich, the end of the second Act II is the

Vote Up Vote Down

The kind of plot structure that you are talking about was more common during and before the 1960s. The Broadway shows of the 1950s and 1960s came from a more halcyon, post World War II time, when life was sweeter than it is today. That is to say that stories of the time tended to have a happy ending, and even when they didn't, offered a consolation prize at the end of Act II. (It's debatable whether or not Eliza will be happy going back to Professor Higgins, but come what may, she has made great progress learning to be a lady.

This era gave way, in the late 1960s (to the present) to stories where there were greater angst. These stories were sometimes melodramatic, such as "Portnoy's Complaint," and sometimes high stakes "Agent Orange" or "Erin Brockovich. But in any event, the post Vietnam War culture largely brought an end to the "sunny" story lines of the 1950s and 1960s, which is why the end of the second Act tended to be from the depths of despair (post late sixties), rather than "halfway up the hill.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

I think there are plenty story theorists who would want you to see that you are looking at two sides of the same structure. Whether you are thinking of Eliza Doolittle or Top Gun, the structure is the same: the hero's second act is about mentorship, and in the third act they face their challenges alone.

Whether that character at the end of Act 2 faces their deepest darkest moment, or whether they are filled with chipper optimism is really more about the lightness of touch in your story. Both characters are ready to face their challenges (with new knowledge or skills), but both have also had their crutches taken away. There is always determination and doubt, but your story's tone will determine which of those you need to emphasise.

If your hero is tough in a gritty thriller, you'll need to take them to dark depths to evoke any kind of anxiety about the third act, but if your hero is extremely delicate in a gentle social satire, their darkest depths may merely be discovering that their hat doesn't fit properly and threatens to cause embarrassment at the garden party.

I have seen comedy movies where the writers have taken the deepest-depths thing too literally, and put slapstick characters into jarringly serious scenes with comic actors who couldn't pull it off. The character doesn't need to go to the darkest place you can imagine, they just need to face a bigger test than anything so far. They can be perfectly thrilled about facing the challenge if that is what suits the story.

(0)