: Arch Hero and Arch Nemesis in one book I am standing before a problem. For my story I largely developed the background and the world for two main characters: the hero of my stories and
I am standing before a problem.
For my story I largely developed the background and the world for two main characters: the hero of my stories and a villain. I started with the story of my hero, his life and his actions as a first book. But the villain was so persistent that through months of work he can have his own story and maybe his own book and I am seriously considering it.
The book about my hero will be the storytelling type where the end of the villain will be written.
The book about the villain will be in a diary form.
The problem here is that when you first read the book about the hero, you will know what happened with the villain.
Is it a correct way here to merge those stories together and tell both of them in one book?
More posts by @YK4692630
: Show more not tell implementation in writing? What does this mean? If I have to SHOW more about a particular traumatic event which happened to me, I would probably not be able to recall the
: Effective differentiation of dream sequence from "normal text" There are lots of questions about how to write about dream, how will it be in a book etc. I have a bit different question. Imagine
2 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
I think that the greatest factor you have to consider is the length of your story.
Would combining the stories make your book into a 150,000 word epic? Or if they were separate would there not be enough substance that you would have to invent a lot of filler just to get the word count up? There is precedent for having the stories separate or combined, so either is possible.
Having a villain origin story that is chronologically before the hero's story, but told afterwards, has been done many times (see Star Wars or Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel!). This story tends to allow the reader insight into a tragic character, who tries to be a hero but is a victim of circumstance that survives through experiences that causes their ideologies to change, causing them to become villainous.
I've even read stories told from a villain's perspective after they were the villain, which tend to be redemption stories about how the villain of a previous tale attempts to right the wrongs they have committed.
Telling both stories in unison, you will likely have to focus on how the two characters are two sides of the same coin. They may both be trying to save the world, but have different ideas of how to do it. It may be that the two main characters are siblings/ friends who have a similar background, but veer onto different paths.
Whichever story you tell, in order to tell it from the villain's perspective, you need to make that character relatable. The reader must identify with this character on some level in order to keep them interested in pursuing their story.
They may be a The End Justifies The Means villain, or a Disillusioned/ Fallen Hero. They may even just be the absolute worst type of person who has a pet kitten that they cherish and adore. In order to get the reader to justify reading about the inner workings of the antagonist, they need to have some reason to invest their emotions into reading about the character.
You can still make the roles of Hero and Villain obvious and distinct to the reader, but there must be at least some shades of grey within the roles of good and evil. There is no use for a reader to commit to reading about a villain who is evil just for the sake of being evil.
Every hero's tale starts with a set of circumstances that causes them to pursue their journey, the villain must have one also.
You could, but having separate stories is a good idea as well. Knowing the outcome can actually make the story more interesting; think of Anakin Skywalker, who everyone knew from the beginning was going to become Darth Vader. The interesting part here is how he became evil, rather than the discovery of it.
You could also, as you mentioned, fuse the two stories into one; the risk here is to have two distinct story lines that only fuse together at the very end (depending on how early on the Hero and Villain interact with each other). But it is also an interesting way to keep the reader confused as to which character is the real Hero, and which one is the Villain.
Whichever idea you feel most comfortable with, I suppose :)
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.