: Correct spacing for "Smith et al. (2008)" An academic paper is referred to as using the authors name and publication year. For example, Smith (2008) studied the property of blah-blah Smith
An academic paper is referred to as using the authors name and publication year.
For example,
Smith (2008) studied the property of blah-blah
Smith and Johnson (2013)'s article investigated blah-blah
Johnson et al.(2009)'s paper studies blah-blah
Here I wonder what is the correct spacing between the name(s) and year (in the parenthesis) and between year and "'s".
In #1 . putting a space between Smith and (2008) looks natural,
but in #2 , it is weird because there is a space between Johnson and "'s".
(Without (2013), it becomes "Johnson 's")
Is there any clear rule or common practice for this?
More posts by @Karen856
: Style when intentionally misspelling? I am copyediting and doing layout on a play that includes a few plays on words and intentional misspellings. At first glance they read like typos. I am
: Self-translating into English I am finishing writing my first book (in Slovak, SF) and will be looking for publishers soon. I was considering self-publishing but I don't think I can do more
2 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
That's an annoying construction to punctuate, I agree. You might try:
Smith and Johnson's article (2013) investigated blah blah
The article from Smith and Johnson (2013) investigated blah blah
The paper from Johnson et al. (2013) investigated blah blah
Please note the space between al. and 2013. The al. is short for alia, meaning "others."
In any case, I wouldn't put the apostrophe-S after the year in parens. It looks too weird. Reword until you get the year and possessive apart.
I'm not entirely sure, but with correct grammar, I'm fairly sure it would be this:
Smith and Johnson's (2013) article investigated blah-blah
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.