bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : Sight Words standards for children's books Are there certain standards for writing children's books? For example, I know there are certain sight words for children depending on age and grade. - selfpublishingguru.com

10.02% popularity

Are there certain standards for writing children's books?

For example, I know there are certain sight words for children depending on age and grade. Are there standards that say you can only use a certain sight words for certain ages?

If so, do these standards keep you from getting incorporated into classrooms or curriculum or published in any way?


Load Full (2)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Berryessa137

2 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

10% popularity

I will answer this assuming you have not got a contract and don't want to write for a current series.

It depends on what age you are writing for and what you are trying to do. If you are trying to get published as a standard text for young children you will need a series of books that have a very clear progression mapped out for the reader and the teacher. In these books words have to fit the lists (a big publisher might decide they know what these lists should be, but it is unlikely an individual could) and you have to have a reason for schools to buy your books over an established set of texts.

It is possible to supplement the lists, but only with common words students would use. (I have written some phone games where the National Curriculum lists for each age group are supplemented with extra words, such as days of the week -- these words are available to the teacher.) Otherwise, you have to stick to whatever your education authority specifies, assuming that they do specify something.

However, if you want to write a children's book that will be loved, cherished and repeated off by heart by pupils for years to come, ignore the set lists. Michael Rosen didn't consider the set lists when he wrote Going on a Bear Hunt. Each Peach Pear Plum wasn't a success because it only used a limited vocabulary. The Hungry Catepillar didn't thrill children because it followed a publisher's sentence length guidelines.

Other than Dr Seuss, who wrote some stunning works of art that excited children about reading, I am not aware of books that are consistently outstanding and yet only use limited vocabulary lists. Chip and Biff (much as the series was used by schools) just didn't excite me about the world (okay, I was an adult, but still).

My advice, and I am a teacher who buys books, would be to write a book children want others to read to them so often it is memorised. Of course you have to consider the vocabulary of the audience, but more importantly, you want to set their hearts and minds on fire -- you want to change the world for a little person, not just tick off boxes on a word list.


Load Full (0)

10% popularity

The answer will vary from publisher to publisher. You're most likely to run into very rigid standards when your book is just one in a larger series, and this is a common scenario with educational publishers. In this case, publishers want the books in a series to be comparable in almost every way--sentence length, number of sentences per page, range of vocabulary, etc.

If you're dealing with a book that is not part of a series, it's up to the editor you're dealing with. Many editors would simply consider the text as a whole to determine if it is age-appropriate, but some might have a more formal checklist.


Load Full (0)

Back to top