: Re: Is it more effective to lead with a physical conflict rather than an emotional one? I currently have the choice of two routes with my novel - to lead with a knives-and-poisons main conflict,
I think that depends entirely on your story and the initial mood you're trying to establish (both for the story and between the characters).
Starting with a physical conflict is a fairly easy way to quickly draw your reader in. It's the cheapest way of creating dramatic circumstances: Raise your reader's pulse quickly in order to demand their focus.
If you start with an emotional conflict or backstory, you gamble a little with their interest in that plot line. It's harder because this way you need to convince the reader that this is both dramatic and interesting, while two dudes fighting or a battle scene does that almost implicitly.
So what should you start with? Well, what is the tone and speed of your story? Start high quickly (and then take the reader on rollercoasters) or slowly build up and increase tension over the course of the first act?
The final answer to your question is: There is no "best practice", just what suits your particular story progression.
More posts by @Correia211
: How to show that one long line of poetry is only one line If I'm writing the following clerihew resume where I'm constrained to 40 characters per line. +----------------------------------------+
: Are there legitimate uses for using bold for emphasis within a sentence? Is there any legitimate use for using bold to emphasize something in written speech within a sentence? I understand that
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.