: Can a source be cited just to substantiate a claim, without specifically mentioning the author or the content? For example, if I make the claim: "there are experts in the field that think X
For example, if I make the claim:
"there are experts in the field that think X is fascinating."
and if I insert a footnote source, like this:
"there are experts in the field that think this way[1]."
Footnote [1]: Author, Date, Title: X might be interesting, Publisher etc.
Would this be wrong? Or should I always cite the author even when I don't directly cite the work or any of its content, but use it only to substantiate a claim.
More posts by @Mendez196
: What is the term for a show or movie that has no actual story? When i see so many generic trash shows like "The Mist" i cant help to wonder, what is the story exactly? Why do they show
: What are character flaws and what makes a good one? I mean, what exactly defines a flaw for a character? I know that the character's flaws should have at least some impact in the story, instead
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
When I am reading non-fiction I will often assume that a particular assertion has some evidence behind it. However, particularly when the assertion is something I have not thought of before, I want to see some sort of evidence for it.
I look to see whether there are footnotes or references within the text. Anything that leads me to think that the author of a text has external evidence to support his/her ideas is welcomed by me, whatever the form. Avoid being vague about who your source is and where he/she/it can be found.
I need to be able to find the source you quote if I am to trust you as a source.
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.