: Are -lich adjectives and adverbs critiqued in German fiction? The anti-adverb advice for English should be (and often is) stated as specific to -ly manner adverbs; Ben Blatt has found the more

Vote Up Vote Down

I'm a native German speaker and think of myself as well-read, but I'm not a professional writer. At least I'm not paid to write anything other than source code and manuals.
I have never heard of a rule advising against using adverbs in writing in German. Maybe that's because there's no regularity to adverbs in German, and -lich adverbs are just a random selection, not forming their own true subclass, really.
As such, the examples from the question and the answer about Italian do not ring any alarm bells, when translated.

Er lief langsam.
Er lief langsamen Schrittes.
Er lief vorsichtigen Schrittes, als hätte er jedesmal Angst, den Boden zu berühren.

 

Er rannte.
Er rannte schnell.

All of these variations are more or less semantically equivalent, and while I would not expect to see the more convoluted variants in everyday writing, I wouldn't frown upon finding the simpler examples in "high level" writing.
And some new examples with -lich:

Die Sonne schien.
Die Sonne schien herrlich.
Die Sonne schien freundlich.
Natürlich schien die Sonne.
Sie begrüßten die Sonne herzlich.

As for some of these adverbs being redundant, like the running fast example, I rather perceive them to add colour, or emphasis, or a subjective valuation, which makes for better writing, in my humble opinion.
So my personal verdict is: a rule that discourages adverbs, or -lich adverbs, specifically, does not exist in German.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

This is a very good question, that moves away from english language to embrace language and writing in general.
In Italian, my native language, we have adverbs with a very clear ending, "-mente" (i.e.: "lentamente = slowly"). Of course repeating many words with the same ending sounds dull, and should be avoided.
I have never read about a generic anti-adverb rule in italian. Consider that our language tradtion is traditionally much more rethorical than the english one: we use a lot of subordinates, implicit forms, adjective couplings, and therefore we are not short on adverbs.
After reading writing essays in english, where the usage of adverbs was discouraged, I realized that even when writing in italian I should have used them less.
But rather than just blindly expunge them from the text, you should think about what are adverbs. Grammatically, they are just specific words: the problem here is their function, not the word per se. If you write

He was walking slowly.

or

He was walking in a slow pace.

it's kind of the same thing, right?
There is nothing wrong in using adverbs, they are part of the speech as anything else. So why we suggest to avoid them?
Because they are at the same time cheap and redundant, and we can write a much better prose if we find a way around them.
Adverbs are cheap, because adverbs are generic, and can be very trite and devoid of meaning. What does "slowly" mean? Is it just a matter of speed, or is there is something more? Adverbs are cheap, because you use one word for something that could be shown with more nuances and details. Consider the "Show, don't tell" principle.

He was walking slowly.
He was walking with hesitant steps, as if he was afraid to hit the ground each time.

Adverbs are redundant, because most of the time don't add anything to a description.

He was running.
He was running fast.

Unless we have a very specific reason to indicate that "fast", we pretty much have everything we need in the verb "to run".
In conclusion: there is not a specific suggestion against adverbs in the italian language, other than to avoid the repetition created by the identical endings in "-mente". But to carefully use them in a prose that aims to be effective, is an advice that is always good taking in consideration.

(0)