: Re: What makes bad science fiction? The obvious way to understand quality is to examine what is successful. On the other hand, it is often more helpful to examine what has failed. Are there
Bad science fiction can have the following characteristics:
It does not hew closely enough to actual science. This is my personal biggest gripe.
It has some ridiculous premise or other (e.g. space aliens come through a worm hole, inseminate all the women of earth, and the offspring are time traveling superheroes). But, as a caveat, some good writers pride themselves on taking ridiculous premises and actually making good stories out of them. Still, hard to imagine a story like that employing good science (#1).
Any quality that makes for bad writing (poor character development, etc) will make for bad science fiction writing
More posts by @LarsenBagley300
: Scientific article: How to say that with our result something could be done but hasn't I am writing something similar to a review article about a scientific insight that connects and streamlines
: Effective hero journeys that don't kill the villain? Are there good examples of the hero's journey that don't include any physical deaths within them? My hero has crisis and 'death' of self/ideals/psyche;
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.