: Re: Is it necessary to always write a prefix to indicate a Part Number in technical writing? I'm wondering if there is an accepted way to prefix part numbers in technical writing. What I have
Long ago, I used to write manuals for large, complex machines, and so had a lot of part number references; I've seen (and used) Part Number 123456, PN 123456, P/N 123456, Number 123456, N123456, No. 123456, P: 123456, and #123456 all as prefixes to part numbers.
I think it's down to what will work best to set your company's standard, what's simple and consistent with other elements of your company style guide, what's easily readable by your readers, and what's easily managed by your IT and marketing folks for websites & help systems.
Because I too am curious about what's most commonly used now, I've posted a variation of this question in a tech writer's Slack forum I'm part of, and will comment the aggregated responses here once I've received and assessed them.
More posts by @Welton431
: I saw a post on exactly this idea on WtD slack channel a few days back - I want to say the approach was called typson+docson, and was directly pulling comments into a documentation system
: How can I make a case for toning down the "rah rah" marketing tone around technical content? Summary Starting from the position that -- with modern web delivery -- the line between technical
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.