: Should I explain the consequences of the contributions in the contribution section? Should I explain the consequences of the contributions in the contribution section of a research paper? For instance,
Should I explain the consequences of the contributions in the contribution section of a research paper?
For instance, what is the best option between these two (if any)?
In this paper, we provide the following contribution:
We prove that if X is a complete metric space and T: X -> X is a contraction mapping then there is a unique fixed point.
or
In this paper, we provide the following contribution:
We prove that if X is a complete metric space and T: X -> X is a contraction mapping then there is a unique fixed point. The consequences of this theorem are ...
More posts by @Cooney417
: Why is the real historical value in novels rated so low in publishing? Writing historical novels takes time and motivation to research and study if you want to write something valuable and serious.
: Pitching an RPG to a publisher: what to bring and how to safeguard the work I'm not sure how different it would be to pitch an RPG (Role Playing Game) manual to a publisher compared to pitching
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
I would not provide the consequences; those are detailed in the paper itself.
If anything, you have an abstract at the front of the paper that will tend toward that, e.g.
We will show that there is a unique fixed point in this transformed mapping, thus demonstrating the viability of Finkleworth's proposal. We then implement that and demonstrate ...
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.