: Re: Characterisation: What lines can an antihero cross while retaining reader sympathy? Now, to clarify ahead of time; I'm quite aware that compelling doesn't necessary equal sympathetic and vice versa.
These are the factors that influence where the line is. It will be floating, depending on context. The following would increase reader sympathy, given a morally dubious main character:
Motivation - Give the character a compelling reason for their reprehensible actions.
Information - Create a scenario where the bad actions are the result of misinformation the character receives.
Comparison - make other worse characters to compare your character against. You can even make your main character antagonistic to them.
Feedback - produce negative repercussions for your main character's bad behavior.
Enjoyment - as other answers have noted, a character that enjoys doing bad things has severely damaged relatability.
Flaws - a subset of (1), your character may have tragic or otherwise blameless reasons for being morally flawed.
Context - maybe your main character's bad actions are, relative to other options, far superior. The executioner who kills torture victims may personally loathe their work, but consider himself to be a merciful figure.
The victim - make the victims even worse people, a subset of (3). We root for Dexter not because he's a murderer, but because his targets are (arguably) acceptable targets of violence.
More posts by @Cofer669
: Is it permissible to use subconclusions for argumentative paragraphs if they contain multiple arguments in support of the main point? Argumentative paragraphs often contain a topic sentence that
: Where can I find information on how different genres are conventionally written? I'm having a very hard time finding a list and examples of stylistic subgenre conventions. To be specific: how
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.