: Authorship implications of presenting one’s manuscript as an older one in the prologue Umberto Eco, E. T. A. Hoffmann and others have pretended (in the introduction to the story) to have found

Vote Up Vote Down

This is an accepted literary device, as others have said.

However, it would be wise to avoid claiming your "old manuscript" was by a historical figure, especially if they wrote books that are still read. That's really asking for confusion to break out. Claiming that the old manuscript was by a living person risks all sorts of complications, and should definitely be avoided.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

Pretending to "have found and edited an obscure manuscript" is quite a common literary device. A few other examples include Neil Gaiman's The Dream Hunters (Illustrated by Yoshitako Amano, part of the Sandman series) and William Goldman's The Princess Bride.

You will note that in all examples, while the pretence is maintained within the body of the text, the book is credited to the real author. It's right there, on the cover. Which is to say, it is a game played inside the story, but never crossing over into the world of publishing. You approach a publisher, you present your work as what it really is - your work, using a fun literary device.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

I don't think so.

It's purely a literary device

And an old one, at that. Some classical, widely recognized authors have used it in the past (Manzoni's Promessi Sposi - or The Betrothed comes to my mind. Another one is Cervantes' Don Quixote). Authors used to do this for a variety of reasons - for example, Manzoni did it so he could place his work in the past and avoid censorship for being critical of the government of northern Italy.

You may find other - more recent - examples in this researchgate question or searching "found manuscript" device on Google.

Aside from being a well-established literary device, you won't risk your publisher denying you anything. They would need a copy of the "found" manuscript to claim ownership, and such copies don't exist, and you can (I suppose) easily prove authorship of anything you've written.

If your work is good - so good that they want to claim it - they will have better chances working with you rather than trying to put up such a scam.

Update and Edit:
My previous statement about classical Greek and Latin authors using this device remains unproved, so I have ruled it out from the answer. At the present time, I could only find information about Dictys Cretensis, Ephemeris belli Troja as a possible example, even if it could be a bordeline example between literary forgery and pseudoepigrapha.

I have found other notable examples:

The Castle of Otranto by Walpole, a 1764 precursor to the gothic novel,
Parzival by Wolfram von Eschenbach, from the 13th century,
Nabokov's Pale Fire in modern times (it's interesting since it references two fictional authors instead of just one) -

(0)