: Re: Are reactive protagonists inherently a bad thing? I'm just getting into writing and while reading about it I've found a lot of topics which claim that reactive protagonists are generally frowned
It's difficult to identify with, or care much about a character who is purely reactive. One of the most valuable aspects of fiction is that it gives us a wide range of role-models whose actions and choices we can either emulate or avoid. But there's little to learn from a character who does nothing but react.
Even a passive character needs to be "actively passive" in order to be compelling (in other words, making choices to not engage, making choices to stay silent, making choices to turn away friends, etcetera).
The most notorious counterexample is Forest Gump. But personally, I hated that character.
More posts by @Kristi637
: Alternatives to starting a sentence with well I'm new to narrative writing and especially have trouble with dialogue. I too often am using the word well to start a character's sentence after
: In a book about political activism, can the author recommend illegal acts--or is that a crime, too? We are writing a short book on how activists can fight against destructive governance...something
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.