bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : Re: Are reactive protagonists inherently a bad thing? I'm just getting into writing and while reading about it I've found a lot of topics which claim that reactive protagonists are generally frowned - selfpublishingguru.com

10% popularity

It's difficult to identify with, or care much about a character who is purely reactive. One of the most valuable aspects of fiction is that it gives us a wide range of role-models whose actions and choices we can either emulate or avoid. But there's little to learn from a character who does nothing but react.

Even a passive character needs to be "actively passive" in order to be compelling (in other words, making choices to not engage, making choices to stay silent, making choices to turn away friends, etcetera).

The most notorious counterexample is Forest Gump. But personally, I hated that character.


Load Full (0)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Kristi637

0 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

Back to top