: How should you use sexually deviant monsters in fantasy? terror is a real and powerful thing. A monster is ever-so-slightly scarier if it violates you in some way. there have been many of these

Vote Up Vote Down

Deviant in reproduction

One of the better uses of a deviant monster is in Alien. A male crew member is "impregnated" orally. The resulting baby is described as something that "shouldn't exist", grows full-sized in hours, has acid for blood, etc. The monster is deviant from conception and defies all of nature's laws.

The sexual violation is all metaphor – if you don't recognize the rape subtext you can still empathize with the body anxiety and Kane's vulnerability. If you do recognize the subtext your sense of dread is elevated and the setup pays off.

Deviant in pleasure

The Cenobites from Hellraiser are expected to be beautiful women who are skilled in the sexy arts, but turn out to be sadomasochistic flesh monsters that want to peal off your skin. Their sexual deviancy is a promise that is taken to the unwelcome extreme.

Both blur sexual imagery and universal body anxiety. The first victims are male, making them instantly scarier and stronger. Arguably, the body violation would not have the same impact if the monsters were selectively hetero-normalized.

Actually just sex, but unpleasant and one-sided

As Kirk so wonderfully said in his answer "If you write without reason, it will show."

I'll paraphrase: if your monsters are just a thinly disguised sexploitation fantasy, no one will be fooled into thinking it is something dark and angsty.

Monsters of the flesh have to be monsters of the mind too. If the idea scares/threatens/violates you personally it is worth exploring. If it is there just to shock and titillate with power fantasies against "empty skirts", it will deservingly get eyerolls from anyone who doesn't share that fantasy, and sees it as a Mars Needs Women trope.

Worst case scenario the rape-y space slug scene backfires and becomes a legendary bad joke.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

So much of this depends on your ability as a writer. In the hands of one author, a monster like this could enhance the story, with a different author, it could cause people to throw the book across the room. The idea, in and of itself, can work, but it's tricky.

What I think makes the biggest difference is the underlying morality tale. Sure, they're for both men and women, but in different ways.

For men, it's about being careful who you choose as a sexual partner, because women can steal your power or are monsters in disguise or will drag you down.

But for women, the message is, don't have sexual urges at all. Don't disobey your father or husband. And don't spend any time with outside men. A man might be in danger from a monster, but a women is no longer worthy of protection from monsters if she "strays."

Even the most modern works often draw on these reservoirs of sexism. And authors who write about periods or invented worlds where such sexism was indeed rampant, will fall into the trap of believing they must mirror it (racism gets the same treatment, but those are different sorts of monsters).

So decide what your underlying message is. Do you want a monster that reinforces it? Or one that reinforces the prevailing morality that your characters chafe against? Does your monster punish those who freely enter into sexual relationships or perhaps is it a monster who punishes those who violate consent?

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

Like all things in writing you write for an audience. There is no direct answer because each audience will have different tastes. If you're trying to scare your audience there are lots of ways to do this including or excluding a sexual monster. You need to answer the question why before you write one in. Why does this monster matter to the world, characters, and story. What is it a foil for? What does it say? Why is it interesting?

You can write whatever, so long as it is engaging. There is no native should. Should requires a moral architecture to create the emperitive. If you have such a moral architecture, or there is one you want to examine, then proceed.

If you write without reason, it will show.

(0)