: Re: Should I cite a source that cites an older source? I am writing a scientific research paper and one of the sources I am using introduced a concept which I am using within the paper. The
Ideally you should not only cite both sources (and others like the 1969 a one that credit the 1944 source), but also acknowledge and defend being your discussion in the 1969 explanation. After all, the paper that invented the idea often didn't explain it in the way people find most pedagogically useful today. You could go with something like this (if the last example is a meta-analysis, textbook or other kind of general review, that's even better):
X means Y. X is attributed in many sources (Johnson 1969, Timson 1984, Reynolds 2003) to Allman 1944. We will follow the notational conventions of Johnson 1969.
I suck at inventing surnames, but you get the point.
More posts by @Phylliss352
: Is there an official license type applied by copyright holder that allows a written work to be continued upon/derived by third-party writers? Say I create a copyrighted written work, is there
: Does a page-turner have to be continually high-octane? I've experimented with both critique partners and people I know (be they friends, family or colleagues) as unrewarded beta readers. The latter
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.