![Sue2132873](https://selfpublishingguru.com/images/player/000default.jpg)
: Re: Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story? Suppose A is a famous historical character with a known history of emotional attachment with a particular set of
The main question is whether your readers will accept it and that depends on two factors:
a) how well is the actual history known
and
b) do your represent your work as historically accurate or as fiction based on history ?
If you make it clear to the reader that you are taking historic events or persons and waving a tale of fiction around them, diverging from actual history, then the reader will not feel cheated.
The world of fiction is full of such stories, and many of them are well received. Stories that claim historical accuracy but don't deliver it are either well received because audiences don't know better, or critized if they do. Often both because a small fraction of the audience knows and complains, but most don't care.
So if your historic person/event is well-known, you should make it clear that your fiction is not the real history. If your person/event is obscure, you may get away without such a disclaimer, leading the reader to believe you are representing historic facts. I personally would advise against it, but it's not like it hasn't been done.
More posts by @Sue2132873
![Sue2132873](https://selfpublishingguru.com/images/player/000default.jpg)
: Crossing the line between justified force and brutality A beta reader of sorts (cousin) mentioned he thought my MC2 rather brutal in her capture of MC1 - though justified. I have her dupe
![Sue2132873](https://selfpublishingguru.com/images/player/000default.jpg)
: This tag should be used for questions about an epilogue in a written piece of work. An epilogue, like a prologue, is a section of a book that stands outside the narrative, as a kind of
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.