bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : To answer your question directly, possibly yes. If I understand correctly, you have the same scene occurring at two different times during the story, with a change in how much we're told - selfpublishingguru.com

10% popularity

To answer your question directly, possibly yes.

If I understand correctly, you have the same scene occurring at two different times during the story, with a change in how much we're told in the scene?

To me, it could make sense to show the same scene twice, and the second time reveal something that was before unknown. I believe this is done often in storytelling, especially when the author seeks to create a feeling of mystery.

Opinion:

However, when following the same POV-character both times, I would perhaps feel somewhat 'cheated', when I didn't get the full insight the first time.

Suggestion:

Now, I do not know your story, so I will suggest multiple ways you could go about this, which would make ME feel less "cheated"...

The following suggestions involve the use of another character and their perception of the scene.

1: Include another character whose POV we follow, and show the first occurrence of the scene from that POV-character's perspective.

This only makes sense, if you have multiple POV-characters in your story. If you haven't, you could consider implementing it. If you are already certain that you will not have such, the second suggestion could be better.

2: Let us hear about the scene, from another character's perspective through, for instance, dialogue.

In order for this to make sense, the character witnessing the scene has to interact with another POV-character, OR at least someone who interacts with the POV-character Joe in some way.

In either case, it then makes sense that we do not know the thoughts of the POV-character Joe the first time we come across the scene.

Bonus-suggestion:
If these other-characters-present-suggestions do not make sense in your story, you could have the POV-character Joe think back on the scene when talking to someone, and then later show the scene in a flashback-line manner, which you seem to be doing in your second example.

If this is to work with the feel of mystery, it would make sense that Joe is talking to someone that he doesn't trust well enough to share the full truth about the scene with. If you can't make the 'lack of trust' work in your story, perhaps 'wanting to protect someone' would make sense instead, which is often why people do not share the full truth with people they otherwise trust.


Load Full (0)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Eichhorn147

0 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

Back to top