: Re: Writing rule which states that two causes for the same superpower is bad writing I've read somewhere that there is this writing rule stating that, for some superpower, it would be less believable
I suspect you're talking about the "1 buy per world" rule. @Wetcircuit explained it well here:
In the Writing Excuses podcast "How Weird is too Weird?", they suggest the reader will accept 1 "buy" for the world and everything else should derive from that. A story with multiple unrelated "buys" will seem unfocused, trying to do too much at once. I've fallen into that problem.
The rule is that speculative fiction readers will generally be happy to suspend disbelief for one major departure from reality as we typically know it. That's an interesting story for any SF or fantasy fan. But two or more unrelated suspensions of disbelief start to make the story seem cobbled together, sloppy, and too undisciplined to be compelling..
The case of two (wholly) different explanations for the same superpower is even worse, since you're paying twice (in coin of suspension of disbelief) for the same product, and not getting twice the bang for your buck. It's a complete waste.
More posts by @Kevin153
: What's it called when the bad guy gets eaten? Is there a specific name for the plot device in which the story's "Big Bad" has a cunning plan to use some monstrous being to further their
: When should the dialogue reference be written, before or after the dialogue? This might be a very trivial question but I don't know what to google to get an answer so asking anyways. In this
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.