bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : Re: Brands to use, brands not to use Inspired by GGx's question Will traditional publishers force you to remove brands? I would probably not want to mention a brand name of a small brand in my - selfpublishingguru.com

10% popularity

I'm not a lawyer, but to my knowledge, the riskiest move, legally, is to use a big company's currently trademarked brand name as a generic, as in "put it in your thermos," or "take the escalator one flight up" (both terms were originally trademarked).

The reason is that the company can actually lose its trademark (see above) if a term is used too often as a generic, and therefore these companies retain teams of lawyers to make sure that doesn't happen. That makes it worth it for them to sue you over this, even if you don't personally have a lot of assets.

Many writers use lightly disguised parody names to get around this (i.e. the "Strawberry" computer company).


Load Full (0)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Kevin153

0 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

Back to top