logo selfpublishingguru.com

 topic : What's a word for a person who took a very rough story and made it into a book? I have written a book. Well, actually, my mother-in-law told the story of her experiences as a German forced

Kristi637 @Kristi637

Posted in: #Collaboration #Editing #Memoir #Translation #WordChoice

I have written a book.

Well, actually, my mother-in-law told the story of her experiences as a German forced laborer in the Soviet Union after World War II. This was given in German and recorded onto audio tape about thirty years ago by my sister-in-law. My S.I.L. later transcribed the story in German onto twenty or so tightly typewritten foolscap sheets, and a few years ago she gave us a copy of this. My wife and I eventually translated this into very rough English (we both speak German, my wife being a native speaker). It is quite a story and we have determined to self-publish it as a book. It's basically finished at this point. So this is what I need: a word (or two) for my having put it into a final form for the book.

See, the original telling was done pretty much as it occurred to her to tell it, and it tends to get lost in parts, backtrack, go forward, and around the bend at times. The final version is still her story, but it has been reworked into what I hope is a readable and understandable whole, with a beginning, a middle and an end. I've also done a spot of research on historical matters pertaining to the story, and because some words she used were Russian, I used Google Translate and the Russian Language SE to get some more information.

On the title page, I am giving the title of the book, followed by a subtitle, then the author attribution.

Below the author attribution (she is now deceased, btw), I want to indicate that the work is a transcription and a translation of the original tale, and the word I need is for the really hard part, putting it into a coherent form for publication. Here's what I got, so far:


by <my mother-in-law>

As told to her daughter <my sister-in-law>.
Translated by her daughter <my wife>
and xxxxed by <me>


What is that word (or words) in the xxx's? Arranged? Edited? What? Or, as someone on the ELU SE said, perhaps I shouldn't even be mentioned at all? Although the form it was in before I worked on it for a few months was completely unpublishable.

10.09% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (9) Report

9 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

@Moriarity138

Moriarity138 @Moriarity138

One word that doesn't seem to have popped up here and may be appropriate is "Ghostwriter".
Not sure how you'd put that on a book cover, and I thought the point of ghostwriting is that you're a 'ghost' i.e. unknown. But, it seems the closest word in my vocabulary to what you're looking for.

Hope that helps.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Sent2472441

Sent2472441 @Sent2472441

Imagine if you set out to write a book based on a true story. You then interviewed your main subject talking about her experiences. That interview was your primary source material.

You would be the author of that book. End of story.

In this case, you're getting confused because the order is different. You had nothing to do with interviewing the subject or transcribing the interview. You came into the project later.

You are still the author.

If the story were nothing but a transcript of the interview (with or without a translation) that would be different. Just like (in the example of another answer) Anne Frank is the author of her diary, which was typed and translated with minimal editing/formatting.

I would say:

(Title)
by (you)
Based on the memoir of (MIL)

You might also do:
by (you) and (wife)

In the acknowledgments, talk about where the story came from and who pulled it all together. Or put those basics on the inside title page.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Smith147

Smith147 @Smith147

Since you have taken the stories in the order they were told, and tried to rearrange them into something alonge the lines of the order in which they occurred, and stitched them together into one chronicle, you could go with "Compiled By"?

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Alves689

Alves689 @Alves689

On the face of it appears to be a biography of X written by you (The author). I assume this on the basis that the published version will exceed the original 20 pages.

If in doubt an enquiry into how the big boys do it reveals:

Anne Frank: The Biography Paperback – 13 Dec 1999
by Melissa Muller (Author), Rita Kimber (Translator), Robert B. Kimber (Translator)

You're the de facto 'editor' because no third party provided the service therefore the function is a given and should not be attributed.

I have not seen the manuscript therefore I cannot be totally definitive in my answers. I've no idea of the framework used. Who's the narrator? Who's telling the story? My mind's in 'film mode' at the moment - "Titanic", "Big Fish", and "Forrest Gump" are stories about people telling stories.

Hope this helps.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Merenda569

Merenda569 @Merenda569

Put on paper by ... might be an option, too. Or recorded by. I also like Adapted by as it has been suggested. Depends on how much you contributed yourself besides merely writing it down.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Turnbaugh521

Turnbaugh521 @Turnbaugh521

Perhaps Adapted by ..... from an oral history of ..... translated from the German by .....

Your contribution has been to convert from one genre (an oral recount) to another (a printed text). In many ways this is comparable to turning a book into a screenplay where "adaptation" is the term used to indicate that the work is not "original".

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Lee1909368

Lee1909368 @Lee1909368

The border between Metilda and Lauren's answers is fuzzy and depends on how much of editing you did. If you took the story nearly verbatim, translated it, polished rough edges, added some preface and made it a smooth reading, you're the editor. If you retold that story, say, changing POV, making a set of memories into a smoothly flowing novel leaving no impression of being just told from distant memories but feeling more "then and there" with many artistic liberties with descriptions, places and characters, you're the author, "basing on..."

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Debbie451

Debbie451 @Debbie451

I'd go with "Edited by." You are not the author (the originator). You took existing work and edited it to make it readable. I think "edited" makes your relationship to the work clear.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

@Megan928

Megan928 @Megan928

Don't over-complicate things. You are an Author. "Authored by _."

It would make more sense for you to write, "As told by (grandmother's name). Translated by (daughter's name). Authored by (your name)." Use an introduction to tell how this story came to be, which will explain each of your roles and your motivations.

10% popularity Vote Up Vote Down

0 Reactions   React


Replies (0) Report

SelfPubGuruLearn self publishing
Back to top | Use Dark Theme