: Re: Order of references Suppose I have the following references to literature: Miller, H. (1999): … Referred to as: Miller (1999) Miller, F., & Smith,
You haven't mentioned the style guide you're following; different guides have different rules.
For Turabian / Chicago Style, the rules applicable are:
A single-author entry precedes a multiauthor entry beginning with the
same name.
and
Successive entries by two or more authors in which only the first
author’s name is the same are alphabetized according to the coauthors’
last names (regardless of how many coauthors there are).
These rules order your list; since every entry has a different set of authors, chronology doesn't come into it. The order you want (if you are following Chicago style) is:
Miller, H. (1999): … Referred to as: Miller (1999)
Miller, A., & Smith, J. (2003): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2003)
Miller, B., Jones, K., & Smith, J. (2004): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2004)
Miller, B., Smith, J., & Jones, K. (2001): … Referred to as: Miller et al. (2001)
Miller, F., & Smith, J. (2002): … Referred to as: Miller & Smith (2002)
More posts by @Ogunnowo420
: I use the Gollum wiki. It works well for me. There's no database, just wiki-formatted text files. It uses the git version control system so you have a history of every change you make (and
: How can I prepare for a career in instruction writing and editing? To technical background authors (e.g. Isaac Rabinovitch) who would possibly work in teams with non-technically trained writers:
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.