: Re: Tactician's Viewpoint and Contradictory Characterization I have a character who's supposed to be a talented tactician. Because of the setup of the story, this character is contrasted with another

Let's call your characters Dave (the intuitive tactician) and Kate (the analytic) so we have some way to refer to them.

Kate can be so analytical, so dependent on data, that she feels like she can't ever commit to a decision. But what if there's one more supply train coming? Did we think of every single possible scenario and prepare for it? Do we really know how much the enemy has in munitions? These two intelligence reports conflict; which one is right? And so on.

Dave totally gets how armies move. He couldn't call a pincer movement by name, he can't articulate why he'd want light cavalry over heavy, but if you put him in front of a battle mockup board he will totally plan out your strategy by moving counters around and saying "Okay, these guys here, and that troop there, and when the enemy comes in we do this, and Bob's your uncle."

This makes Kate insane, because Dave can't connect his intuitive understanding of mass movements to any data she has on hand. Sure, if you point out that foot troops can cope with marshland better than mounted troops he'll agree with you, but he couldn't come up with that sentence on his own. Kate makes Dave insane because she takes so much time wibbling over the data and refusing to do anything that the enemy decides the battle for her. He's already figuring out how to take the highlands and she can't decide whether to attack at dawn or at noon.

While it's not typical to have an "intuitive tactician," you might be able to pull it off if you consistently show that he knows what he's doing. The "over-analytical analyst" is more common.

Load Full (0)

: If you're concerned about too many accidents, then try to find a way to add some purpose to some of them. 1) It's doubtful that you can find a way for a comet to land in someone's garden

@Carla500

Load Full 0 Comments

: Many of the original Grimm and Andersen fairytales had tragic elements in their endings. The Little Mermaid got legs, but every step felt like walking on broken glass, and she doesn't win

@Carla500

Load Full 0 Comments

: How to write good erotic scene? I am thinking of adding a sub-plot to my story where we have say, Adam and Eve. They do not quite like each other but one thing leads to another and they

@Carla500

Load Full 6 Comments

: In modern writing is there a a significant difference between satire and parody? Are there significant differences between satire and parody? Can you provide examples of the difference? Do

: Re: Tactician's Viewpoint and Contradictory Characterization I have a character who's supposed to be a talented tactician. Because of the setup of the story, this character is contrasted with another

More posts by @Carla500

: If you're concerned about too many accidents, then try to find a way to add some purpose to some of them. 1) It's doubtful that you can find a way for a comet to land in someone's garden

: Many of the original Grimm and Andersen fairytales had tragic elements in their endings. The Little Mermaid got legs, but every step felt like walking on broken glass, and she doesn't win

: How to write good erotic scene? I am thinking of adding a sub-plot to my story where we have say, Adam and Eve. They do not quite like each other but one thing leads to another and they

: In modern writing is there a a significant difference between satire and parody? Are there significant differences between satire and parody? Can you provide examples of the difference? Do

Login to post a comment!

0 Comments

Back to top