: Confusion on inconsistent verb tenses in a magazine article I have an obstacle writing articles that have consistent verb tenses. Generally, I've been told that if I start an article in the

@Cooney417

Vote Up Vote Down

I have an obstacle writing articles that have consistent verb tenses. Generally, I've been told that if I start an article in the past tense, I should keep other verbs in the past tense. But as I read more articles, books. I get confused by the verb tenses used in those literatures. Take for example in the following article. I believe it started in the past tense (the 1st paragraph), yet the second paragraph switched to the present tense (it sounds like the...). In the third paragraph a mixed on the past and present tense are used (the word gave is in past tense yet remain is in the present tense). Why in this article and many other literatures I get the impression that the author was changing verb tenses?

REPRESSED for decades, the anger burst like a summer storm. Rioting
youths flooded city streets. The shaken regime granted hasty
concessions: freer speech; an end to one-party rule; real elections.
But when Islamists surged towards victory in the first free elections
the army stepped in, provoking a bloody struggle that lasted until the
people, exhausted, acquiesced to a government similar in outlook,
repression and even personnel to that which they had revolted against
in the first place.

It sounds like the recent history of several Arab countries: Bahrain,
Egypt, Libya, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen, the states of the 2011 Arab
spring, have seen some or all of the story unfold. But this is also,
and originally, Algeria, a quarter of a century earlier—the first
major political crisis in the age of modern Islamism.

A flurry of freedom in the late 1980s gave way to a vicious civil war
in the 1990s that left as many as 200,000 dead and Algeria’s Islamists
more or less defeated, but not eradicated. Today the country’s
citizens remain powerless spectators to a continued stand-off between
what they call le pouvoir—the entrenched oligarchy that controls the
state, the oil money and the army—and the now-marginalised Islamist
radicals, who serve more as a justification for ongoing repression
than as any sort of inspiration to ordinary people.

(1)

Login to post a comment!