bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : How can clarity and flow of long sentences be improved? Sometimes it seems desirable to pack a lot of interrelated information into a single sentence, but such sentences can lack clarity or - selfpublishingguru.com

10.03% popularity

Sometimes it seems desirable to pack a lot of interrelated information into a single sentence, but such sentences can lack clarity or seem tiring.

For example, the following sentence seems to leave no space for breath:

John said it was constructed in 1664 during the Dutch occupation in Taiwan by an admiral that had decided to settle in the island.

How can one structure such sentences for greater readability while maintaining the relationships of the parts and avoiding choppy writing?


Load Full (3)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Candy753

3 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

10% popularity

I will second CLockeWork's comment. I will also add that while parentheses work, I think commas are more readable.

John said it was constructed in 1664, during the Dutch occupation in
Taiwan, by an admiral that had decided to settle in the island.


Load Full (0)

10% popularity

Others may disagree, but I'm a big fan of parentheses. In this case, the Dutch occupation is a side note to give some context to 1664. It could be omitted without changing the real meaning of the sentence.

John said it was constructed in 1664 (during the Dutch occupation in Taiwan) by an admiral who had decided to settle in the island.

Please note, I would also use who, rather than that. The admiral is a person.


Load Full (0)

10% popularity

John said it was during the Dutch occupation in 1664, in Taiwan, that an admiral who had decided to settle in the island, constructed it.


Load Full (0)

Back to top