: Re: academic writing: direct quote I have a simple question regarding scientific quotes. Which of the following alternatives is correct? Alt. 1: The literature has made substantial strides towards
Doreen, in response to your comment that you simply want to emphasize the year in your prose because it's important to whatever point you're making, then this is a matter of style.
Using your example sentence, you can strengthen the saliency of the year the conclusion was made by giving it it's own sentence if you're going to follow with other years in which strides were made (2011, 2012, etc)
The literature has made substantial strides towards identifying causal effects of X on Y. In 2010, J. Miller concluded...
Or if not you can replace the 'and' with a semicolon, making the year/quote less of an afterthought:
The literature has made substantial strides towards identifying causal effects of X on Y; in 2010, J. Miller concluded...
You can make the date 'more salient (to what I do not know as we have only this sentence to work with) with
As early as 2010 | Most notably in 2010 | etc
If that helps achieve your goals.
I'm not sure what's gained by putting the year in parenthesis when it's not parenthetical and not a citation.
More posts by @Berryessa137
: How to write a book in 2 weeks? I got challenged to write a book of 100 pages in two weeks. I see this challenge as a game that can be played in many different ways. What are the most
: Is scripting a cartoon tv show the same as scripting a movie? I don't know if this is the correct place to put this but here goes. I'm just curious if scripting a cartoon is like scripting
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.