bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : How firmly must I remain in my characters POV? Is it legitimate (acceptable) to use a 3rd person POV approach with the narration intentionally being a bit wobbly? I'm using an alternating 3rd - selfpublishingguru.com

10.01% popularity

Is it legitimate (acceptable) to use a 3rd person POV approach with the narration intentionally being a bit wobbly?

I'm using an alternating 3rd person POV structure. One character (Let's call her Jane) refers to her mother (Aliana) as Mama. But I'm using the woman's name in the narrative, not "Mama." Example:

Jane said, “I wonder if there will be more puppies in this litter."
“We
expect fewer.” The bluntness of Aliana’s statement was a punch to
Jane’s gut.
“Fewer? Mama, puppies are the only thing worth living
for!”

I could change Aliana in the second line to 'Mama,' but this quickly becomes tiresome to me as a reader. I'd rather use the name. I've heard conflicting advice here and am seeking some clarity.
.

When another character enters a house for the first time, he can describe the paint color and the smell of something in the oven. That's clear character POV territory. But I'd like to add in commentary about what he is smelling, something like this:

...as though something was about to come out of the oven, but
some might say the product never quite lived up to the promise.

He has no way to know that what he smells isn't going to be as good as he hopes, but I'd like to tuck this sort of thing in, anyway. It seems like a POV breach, but my instincts say this is OK.
Is this considered a weak POV and if so, is it OK? Is there a name for this?

Load Full (1)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Sent2472441

Login to post a comment!

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

10% popularity

This is perfectly normal.

It would be weird if the narrator used "Mama" in your first example. "Jane's mother" might be acceptable, but just using "Aliana" is perfectly fine and clear.

About your second example: the narrator can of course "look into the future" or just in the other room and thereby tell that it's not quite what the character thinks it is. There is no reason why he would have to stick to what the character smells.

I think your examples are fine and this style is acceptable. In fact, I don't really see why you would think it's wrong in the first place. Imagine your narrator as a character - maybe he is omniscient or looking at it as if it was a memory, but he is still a character and as such he should be able to distinctly name other characters by names he would find appropriate and comment on things as he sees fit. He has a personality of his own.

Load Full (0)

Back to top