![Dunderdale623](https://selfpublishingguru.com/images/player/000default.jpg)
: Re: Abbreviation for "figures" in scientific papers In scientific papers, the term "Figure" -- referring to an illustration in the text -- is often abbreviated as "Fig." But is "Figures" abbreviated
I'm a translator. Once upon a time, I searched "scientific paper style figure table abbreviation" and I got this:
Abbreviation of the word "Figure": When referring to a Figure in the text, the word "Figure" is abbreviated as "Fig.", while "Table" is not abbreviated. Both words are spelled out completely in descriptive legends.
In short: main text -> abbreviation; caption -> spell out.
Later, the format that I use and the one my coworker uses conflict. I searched hard to find the old reference back and this time I notice that the reference is from "Bates College" (what is that anyway) and in the process of the "re-searching" (I mean "search again") it turns out Bates College is the only place that says you should style a paper this way!
As a result, there is no uniform global rule. And I have to follow the "local rule" (I don't like it).
More posts by @Dunderdale623
![Dunderdale623](https://selfpublishingguru.com/images/player/000default.jpg)
: Using a pronoun outside of quotations to refer to a person mentioned in quotations who hasn't been introduced yet Would the line: "Peter!" cried his father. make grammatical sense? It seems
![Dunderdale623](https://selfpublishingguru.com/images/player/000default.jpg)
: Go with ×תה. While not natively Israeli, I am currently living in Israel. And from what I know, speaking the language and seeing what goes on here, when you don't know the gender, it's
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.