: Ordinal form of an unknown value In some science and engineering literature, it is common to right the ordinal form of an unknown number m as mth. While the ordinal form of number 1 is first,
In some science and engineering literature, it is common to right the ordinal form of an unknown number m as mth. While the ordinal form of number 1 is first, it is also commonly written as 1st. I was wondering what would be the most appropriate way to write the ordinal form of (m-1)? (m-1)th or (m-1)st?
More posts by @Annie587
: Publishing a book with anonymity as a foreigner I want to publish a book in the United States as a foreigner in anonymity because of political risks in my country. How can I do this? I don't
: Chicago notes citation question: how to cite an entry from an annotated bibliography? I apologize in advance if I shouldn't post this question here. I am trying to cite an entry from a book
1 Comments
Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best
(m-1)th is still appropriate. The expression in parentheses will still be read without the ordinal, so consider how it sounds when spoken—em-minus-oneth makes more sense than em-minus-onest.
I should also note that it's common to avoid the problem entirely through rephrasing (e.g. 'the value at index (m-1)'), but that may not be applicable to your field.
Terms of Use Privacy policy Contact About Cancellation policy © selfpublishingguru.com2024 All Rights reserved.