: Re: How do expert writers avoid using "I" when they have to refer to themselves in their article? How do competent authors, in a refined and perhaps (slightly) formal way, refer to themselves without

This writer is correct.

For example:

Exercise has many benefits. Proponents of exercise find there is a large variety of exercise options to fit different lifestyles. Barack Obama goes running in the morning. Jane Doe attends a weekly dancing class. I myself do press ups and stomach crunches in between writing stints through out the day.

The writer can remove the first person perspective by replace 'I myself' with 'this writer'.

Exercise has many benefits. Proponents of exercise find there is a large variety of exercise options to fit different lifestyles. Barack Obama goes running in the morning. Jane Doe attends a weekly dancing class.This writer does press ups and stomach crunches in between writing stints through his writing day.

Load Full (0)

: I can think of one reason: If you have a co-writer, it gives you the confidence to revert to a previous form if you don't like their writing. Or combine conflicts if both of you are writing

@Ann1701686

Load Full 0 Comments

: First version has a minor grammar error: ... and allows you ... Apart from that, both are fine. I would probably use the second version. I think both sentences are too similiar to use

@Ann1701686

Load Full 0 Comments

: Can I, as a reader, submit a "Bug Report" for a novel? I just finished a new release. I encountered a passage in the book that doesn't quite make sense. Just a single sentence that is out

@Ann1701686

Load Full 2 Comments

: Plot idea to make the murderer (involuntarily) reveal himself I'm in need of an idea to advance my fictional crime plot where the protagonists of a larger (~30) group realize that the murderer

: Re: How do expert writers avoid using "I" when they have to refer to themselves in their article? How do competent authors, in a refined and perhaps (slightly) formal way, refer to themselves without

More posts by @Ann1701686

: I can think of one reason: If you have a co-writer, it gives you the confidence to revert to a previous form if you don't like their writing. Or combine conflicts if both of you are writing

: First version has a minor grammar error: ... and allows you ... Apart from that, both are fine. I would probably use the second version. I think both sentences are too similiar to use

: Can I, as a reader, submit a "Bug Report" for a novel? I just finished a new release. I encountered a passage in the book that doesn't quite make sense. Just a single sentence that is out

: Plot idea to make the murderer (involuntarily) reveal himself I'm in need of an idea to advance my fictional crime plot where the protagonists of a larger (~30) group realize that the murderer

Login to post a comment!

0 Comments

Back to top

: Re: How do expert writers avoid using "I" when they have to refer to themselves in their article? How do competent authors, in a refined and perhaps (slightly) formal way, refer to themselves without

More posts by @Ann1701686

: I can think of one reason: If you have a co-writer, it gives you the confidence to revert to a previous form if you don't like their writing. Or combine conflicts if both of you are writing

: First version has a minor grammar error: ... and allow*s* you ... Apart from that, both are fine. I would probably use the second version. I think both sentences are too similiar to use

: Can I, as a reader, submit a "Bug Report" for a novel? I just finished a new release. I encountered a passage in the book that doesn't quite make sense. Just a single sentence that is out

: Plot idea to make the murderer (involuntarily) reveal himself I'm in need of an idea to advance my fictional crime plot where the protagonists of a larger (~30) group realize that the murderer

Login to post a comment!

0 Comments

Back to top

: First version has a minor grammar error: ... and allows you ... Apart from that, both are fine. I would probably use the second version. I think both sentences are too similiar to use