bell notificationshomepageloginNewPostedit profile

Topic : Does a work need to be sexually stimulating to be classified as erotica/erotic literature? Does a work need to be sexually stimulating to be classified as erotica/erotic literature? Or will any - selfpublishingguru.com

10.02% popularity

Does a work need to be sexually stimulating to be classified as erotica/erotic literature? Or will any book that deals extensively with human sexuality and sexual relationships be put in that genre?

I'm curious about this because I am writing a short story in which a young woman is dealing with a kind of sexual dysfunction called vaginismus, which makes her incapable of having penetrative sex. The story is about her attempts to overcome the physical condition in a practical and clinical manner. While the story is entirely about human sexuality and sexual relationships, most of the story is not very sexy at all and is not intended to be sexually stimulating. The sex (or trying-to-have-sex) scenes are explicit but more of "what goes where", since the couple are only trying to achieve penetration, not experience pleasure. For the most part it is almost more like assembling IKEA furniture together.

The plot is less about the sexual gratification and making the relationship work and more about overcoming the handicap - which happens to be on a sexual body part. It is about the woman's desire for self-acceptance and a sense of wholeness rather than a desire for sex. Would this be considered erotica, erotic literature, or neither?

How are these sorts of stories generally classified? Does it need to be sexually stimulating? Or is any work that deals substantively with sex considered erotic?

Similar (but, in my opinion, not identical) to At what point can a story be considered “erotic”?


Load Full (1)

Login to follow topic

More posts by @Chiappetta298

1 Comments

Sorted by latest first Latest Oldest Best

10% popularity

I think the Supreme Court definition applies; to paraphrase: erotica and pornography are pretty much undefinable but we know it when we see it.

If you are describing the genitals or breasts of naked people, many will consider just that description erotica, no matter how clinically you approach it. What is not sexually stimulating to you might well be sexually stimulating to somebody else; particularly if you are describing attempts at penetration.

Consider a sixth grade American classroom: they have seen countless murders and kisses on regular used-to-be-broadcast television in prime time (i.e. the main networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc). They have most likely seen pretend-naked men and women under a cover. The naked back of females. But they haven't seen anything on those channels normally covered by underwear. If your work describes what is under the underwear or an attempt at sex (or if you describe alternatives to P-V sex, which is often the backup plan when vaginal sex is too painful), or would not plausibly be read to a sixth grade class, then it is going to be lumped into "erotic fiction".


Load Full (0)

Back to top