: Two protagonists where one is dark - a mistake? I'm currently writing a tale with two protagonists. One of them is a dark protagonist - that is, technically evil. The other protagonist is not

Vote Up Vote Down

I think it's often less important whether a character's personality is likeable than whether their goal is relatable. An evil character who wants to be a better person but doesn't quite know how to go about it might actually be more relatable than a good character who knows exactly what the right thing to do is and just goes and does it.

Most of us know what it feels like to want to be better, or not know what the right thing to do is. As much as we might like the idea, very few of us automatically know right from wrong and just go ahead and do good. Those who believe they are doing this are often the most dangerous people of all, since when they do something wrong they do so with absolute conviction.

So it seems to me that (fundamentally) you have four possible stories here:

(1) Character G (for good) becomes even wiser and better, while character E (for evil) becomes good (perhaps even as good as character G) by the end (perhaps hinting that the person character G is at the end of the story is somebody that character E could also become, with enough work).
(2) Character G is so sure of their goodness that they never question their actions and end up becoming evil, while character E is so determined to become less evil that they actually end up becoming good.
(3) Character G's belief in their own innate goodness becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy, and makes them even better, while character E's recognition of their own evil ultimately drives them to frustration and/or despair and causes them to become even more evil (or become good for a while and then tragically revert to their former ways).
(4) Character G becomes evil (for the reasons described in (2)), while character E becomes even more evil (or temporarily good and then reverts to evil) as in (3). In this case, the story may be a cautionary tale that both extremes have their dangers.

Whichever one of these you ultimately go for, I believe the contrast between the two stories will only serve to make each of them more interesting, and that your premise is a good one. People will get behind both of your characters if they are able to sympathise with their situation and their goals, even if they recognise that the characters are - as people - deeply flawed.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

Each reader probably won't like the protagonists equally. Readers are not a monolithic group. Some will be drawn to the virtue of the good character, while others will eat up the struggles of the dark character. It doesn't even necessarily have to do with their morality, and it's hard to say what character traits will resonate with a particular reader the best.

The only thing you can do is make both characters likeable, and equally fleshed-out. They don't even have to be likeable as people to be likeable as characters. If the character's justifications make sense, and if you explore how they got to be the way they are, even an evil character can be a good character. This is why characters such as Voldemort feel shallow to me (even though Rowling tried to give him some backstory exposition), while I liked Snape as a character. Harkening back to my earlier point, I know that other people have the opposite positions on the characters.

Remember that no one is the villain in their own mind, and only the cartooniest Disney or Superhero villains are evil for its own sake. Only a true psychopath would commit such acts for their own pleasure. All others have motivations for it, feeling that the ends justify the means. That sounds like I have strayed from the question of 'can I make them equally likeable' into the territory of 'how do I make a likeable dark character', but I am really just stressing the importance of letting the reader in on the characters' motivations and justifications equally.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

I think the question is a bit opinion based; and it depends on how evil the evil guy is. Is he just shoplifting once in a while, or getting into bar fights and breaking a finger or nose for the fun of it, or is he still in the business of kidnapping children and selling their transplantable organs? (but trying to quit.)

An Anti-Hero can be likable and even enjoyed MORE than a relentlessly good protagonist: But you have to ensure that the reader sees that, on balance, the good they do is far outweighing any evil they do and that trend should seem permanent and reliable.

For an old example, see Dirty Harry; a more modern version is perhaps Dexter.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

Take a look at "Transformers: Beast Wars" for a good example of this, with specific focus on the characters of Rattrap and Dinobot. The former is a life long soldier for the Maximal cause and is quite possibly the most vocal supporter of fighting for the heroic side. Meanwhile, Dinobot is a devotee to Predicon idealology and warrior culture but betrayed the other Predicons because he felt they were barely paying lip service to these ideals. Notable here is, until very late in his story arc, does Dinobot have any regrets for anything he did while working with the Predicons. This causes conflict between the two as Rattrap believes Dinobot thinks like he does... that there is nothing Dinobot will do as long as its for the cause... and believes Dinobot is truly loyal to the Predicons. Dinobot doesn't trust Rattrap because Rattrap's mentality of "The Ends Justifies the Means" was the whole reason he left the Predicons in the first place. The dynamic is interesting, and while the pair are fan favorites, but Dinobot is considered the highlight of the entire series. Without giving away much as to why, nearly 10 years after the show wrapped up, when the Transformers franchise created a hall of fame for its various important charcters, inductees entered in a rule of 2 Autobots, 2 Decepticons, and one fan voted character. Dinobot pulled a surprising upset victory in the very first Fan Voting and became one of the first five inductees into the Hall of Fame, and the only one in his class to be from a series that wasn't the original cartoon.

Rattrap has yet to recive such an honor.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

This is typically done in Anime quite frequently. Usually anime has a whole slew of main characters that each have their own tropes... and usually 1 of them are dark/were dark/converted/converting. I don't see it being off putting. It's more so the trick of making the audience empathetic to their plight.

Are they running away from their past to realize that everything they knew was a lie? Is their actions of "evil" (dark arts and being evil are in my opinion 2 separate things though they are usually taken as the same EX: See professor Snape from Harry Potter) due to their past and they do it out of fear/hate for the other?

Often in anime, you will see a child of an evil lord who ran away from their dimension and hide on Earth. This person would typically be viewed as technically dark/evil and do things in their way because they don't know any other way. Then you have the other Main protagonist enter the scene and show them the truth and the light of the world and slowly this person converts/builds the bonds they were searching for and act in open rebellion against their parent's ways and usually give some cliche speech about friends and that not everyone is trying to hurt them.

So Yes, it is very possible to have a protagonist be dark, live a dark current/past life and have them be liked by the audience. It is just a matter of how you portray them.

(0)