: What does "juvenile tone" mean? I often hear the word thrown around, but I don't have any idea of what it is, or how can it be avoided. So, what does "juvenile tone" mean and how can I

Vote Up Vote Down

DPT's comment on the original post mentioned a very important thing - context. The way to demonstrate an understanding of context is to be able to switch between different tones where appropriate - if the writer is going to use a juvenile tone, it becomes particularly important to establish the difference between a writer using a juvenile tone and a juvenile writer.

My user name on this site is a piece of juvenile humour. If I was to look at the tag on this post and suggest you moved towards breaking bad writing habits and away from Breaking Bad writing habits, that would be juvenile (and unfair to a fine TV show which cleverly demonstrated an ability to switch tone to deal with serious subjects).

It will be a matter of the taste of the intended audience but, if that's taken into account, there's nothing inherently wrong with using a juvenile tone where the context fits. That said, it's worth making sure the readers know it's a writer using a tone, and not a tone using a writer. A skilful writer will want to show that they have more than one trick up their sleeve.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

"Juvenile tone" means writing like a kid --or, to be more precise --like a young teenager (usually). This is excusable in a young writer, but less so in a writer who should know better. There are writers who have perfected a juvenile tone in the service of a mature book (Catcher in the Rye, or, less seriously, Youth in Revolt) but it's a tricky feat to pull off.

The positive characteristics of juvenile writing are usually enthusiasm, authenticity, innocence and freshness. The negative characteristics of juvenile writing are usually melodrama, unoriginality, shallow characters, a lack of empathy, superficial irony, an unearned sense of superiority, an attempt to shock people just for the sake of being shocking, pretentiousness or precociousness, and a lack of craft, leading to bad or amateurish prose.

As you might have noticed, however, one could have either of those sets of characteristics at any age.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

A juvenile, in human terms, typically refers to a post-pubescent child that is too young for adult responsibilities.

In our culture such people are aware of adult themes (sexuality, pornography, politics and political philosophy, some business practices perhaps, religious philosophy, crime and criminal enterprises, war and the military life, race relations, homosexuality, alcohol, tobacco and drug use and addiction, how marriage works) but have little or no adult experience with any of it.

Yet this lack of deep knowledge does not prevent them from thinking they know everything they need to know about it and how it should work.

That is betrayed in their simplistic writing, and in their crass humor and what they think is "logic" but ignores what the vast majority of adults would consider important caveats, exceptions, or nuances.

There is a psychological theory of humor that "what is funny" depends heavily on what a person knows are "the accepted rules" of society. It is why very young children find bathroom humor hilarious, and political or sexual situation comedy opaque: They understand the rules about not farting or pooping your pants, they don't understand politics or sex in the least.

That applies to juveniles, too. A juvenile may think a joke about homosexuals is hilarious, while an adult is offended, because the adult knows such jokes demean and endanger actual people, and the adult may have friends (as I do) that ARE homosexuals that would be offended, so the adult (through greater life experience) is also offended on their behalf.

Frequently to adults, juvenile humor just seems stupid and uninformed, but is to some extent forgiven if the humor comes from an actual juvenile. They will grow out of it.

If it comes from an adult of normal intellect, it is much less forgiven, it indicates a willful failure to grow up and understand the real world, and if they DO understand, a willingness to be mean and uncaring about others. That is not good friend material.

Your final words "... and does it taste nice?" are juvenile, they treat a serious subject as a joke and imply you don't really give a shit about the answer, you are really just looking for a laugh and seeking attention. Those are more juvenile traits, resorting to derision and jokes and dismissive commentary to cover up their lacks of understanding. They naively think by turning something into a joke (offensive or not) they can always take it back as "just joking," but adults understand that juvenile ploy and don't buy it.

Many juveniles cannot ask a serious question and are reluctant to admit their lack of experience, so they bluff, or try to use humor as a cover (that adults just think is stupid), or they make claims that are obviously mistaken or based on misunderstandings to people with experience.

All of those things together contribute to "juvenile tone," it is something an adult will roll their eyes at as overly simplistic and an uninformed pretense at a sophisticated understanding.

(0)

Vote Up Vote Down

Juvenile tone, is about style, voice and plot. Specially the voice, for as Mark Baker said, it is something linked to your intention with the book and your own personal experiences.

However, do you know what a bad juvenile style and a bad mature style have in common? Their ego.

Here are some of the things that resembles a bad juvenile style:

"Shallow" vocabulary with simple and obvious metaphors and symbolism.
Using much physical combats in your story without measure.
Using too many cliffhangers at the end of many chapters.
A plot that does not talk about more "mature" contents. Juvenile plots often involves saving the world, conquer the boy's love, being famous etc. (You must judge for yourself what is mature and what is not.)
And some may say that shorter lengths of the paragraphs also resembles a more juvenile style (altough this may not be all that bad. It is just the writer's style.)

Compare some mature book with a juvenile one. Mistborn and Kazuo Ishiguro's books? You see a huge gap of difference between then.

But, juvenile styles ARE NOT BAD AT ALL on their own. Their biggest advantages are their simplistic vocabulary, the action and the emotional involvement in the characters, as we want then to succeed in their journey. Keep in mind that this can happen in mature stories as well, but juvenile stories have their own charm with this.

How a "mature style" can be bad for your book:

Mature books can be boring, confusing and hit a small portion of people.
The writer may use erudite words and use certain words just to sound "inteligent."
They aim for certain classes who only them can understand the book and enjoy it.
You want to read a good story and you end up with some scientific-artistic-crazy-philosophy book that you will only understand if you read it ten times.

Instead of being imature, you end up being too complex or inside your own ideas that does not compact with reality, nor anyone may understand it well. Remember that a story tells an idea for it's readers. It adds vision and essence to the reader's life.

If you act like an immature child or an arrogant writer, you are not being a true Writer.

You have to ask yourself what kind of story you want write and WHO is going to read it. With both advantages and disavantages considered, you may decide that easily.

(0)