: Re: How acceptable is "alternate history" in writing (nowadays)? On another site, I wrote a critical review of a book that featured a "King Frederic II" of France who reigned between 1777-1819. I

Alternate History is the same as alternate facts and also theoretical science. The short answer, is that academic teachings and 'common knowledge', CERTAINLY with regard to history, is MOSTLY, incorrect/wrong/lies. EXAMPLE: Hitler was killed in the bunker in 1945. Now, anyone with real knowledge kows that this is far from the truth, to the extent it is now confirmed, but only if asking and looking in right place. The list is endless. And no, it is not acceptable. BUT, if google or your teachers tell you so, you generally are all happy to accept that. Crazy

Load Full (0)

: Books or resources on writing fluidly? I have ADHD, and while I write often very good essays, some of which are published, I seem to struggle to stay on one thought. When I'm writing an argumentative

@Kaufman555

Load Full 0 Comments

: It is hard, I think, to create an authentic voice of a different sex because you can't get inside and hear the truth of an internal voice. I often wonder what on earth my husband's internal

@Kaufman555

Load Full 0 Comments

: I disagree that those three principles don't apply to your story. I think you (we) need to understand your (our) story fairly deeply. Have you identified themes? Example: For a future story,

@Kaufman555

Load Full 0 Comments

: I don't know whether you use different terms in the USA, but as I understand it, here in the UK, there are five different routes to publishing, briefly: Traditional publishing, where you have

: Re: How acceptable is "alternate history" in writing (nowadays)? On another site, I wrote a critical review of a book that featured a "King Frederic II" of France who reigned between 1777-1819. I

More posts by @Kaufman555

: Books or resources on writing fluidly? I have ADHD, and while I write often very good essays, some of which are published, I seem to struggle to stay on one thought. When I'm writing an argumentative

: It is hard, I think, to create an authentic voice of a different sex because you can't get inside and hear the truth of an internal voice. I often wonder what on earth my husband's internal

: I disagree that those three principles don't apply to your story. I think you (we) need to understand your (our) story fairly deeply. Have you identified themes? Example: For a future story,

: I don't know whether you use different terms in the USA, but as I understand it, here in the UK, there are five different routes to publishing, briefly: Traditional publishing, where you have

Login to post a comment!

0 Comments

Back to top